Vick and his dogs
Thursday, July 26th, 2007I’ve got to say I’ve been a little surprised by the brouhaha that has erupted over Michael Vick’s alleged dogfighting. I understand that they’re ‘man’s best friend.’ I love dogs, really I do, but the outrage and jumping to conclusions about guilt in this case has surprised me. Nobody but a psychopath thinks the electrocution, strangulation and beating to death of dogs is a good thing — but there’s less outrage expressed over the deaths of humans all the time.
I also think that only one person should decide whether Michael Vick plays football this season and that’s Michael Vick. The idea that a commissioner can come in and just say, “Conviction? We don’t need a conviction, just ONE criminal indictment, it doesn’t matter, you’re done for the year,” seems a little too much for me. That’s not American. If Vick feels he can play under the stress, then by all means he should be allowed to play until he’s convicted of a crime. Again, it just seems un-American to me, you know the part about innocent until proven guilty?
But we live in an America where the deaths of underperforming pit bulls garner more news coverage and outrage than the deaths (every single day) of innocent human beings.
I’m not saying that Michael Vick is a role model. It seems that at the very least he’s immature and irresponsible. He could be a sadistic psychopath, too. I don’t know.
I do know that there are plenty of things going on in the world right now that deserve our outrage and protests outside of government buildings.

Michael Vick executing even 10,000 dogs (as much as I love them) is way down the list.
-Â PadraicÂ

