Open wide the doors of government, not
Saturday, December 29th, 2007By Kevin Woster
Admittedly, I bring clear prejudice to this issue: I like open records.
They help me do my job, of course. But they also help me understand my government, and what it’s up to. And they make me feel more comfortable that my government isn’t up to no good.
How can more openness in government be anything but good?
So I’m puzzled that so many state legislators join Gov. Mike Rounds in fighting the notion that all state-government records be considered open unless specifically stated otherwise, with a reason given for their closure.
That seems reasonable to me. If you want to close a record, tell us why. If you don’t and can’t, it’s an open record.
A state task force on open government discussed the issue, seriously I think. But as we wait to see if the entire task force will agree to send it on to the state Legislature, that seems unlikely.
One task force member, Sen. Nancy Turbak Berry of Watertown, wants to put the presumption of openness on public records into state law. She doesn’t figure to win that one, however.
Most state legislators don’t seem to embrace the idea. Neither does Rounds.
I don’t get it. Do you?
