Feds clarify position on abandoned geese
Tuesday, March 31st, 2009By Kevin Woster
OK, back to the subject of dumpster geese.
Steve Oberholtzer of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in Lakewood, Col., called bright and early this morning to explain the apparent contradiction in F&WS statements on gifting processed waterfowl.
Oberholtzer is the special agent in charge of the Mountain Prairie Region for the F&WS, which includes South Dakota. So he’s Bob Prieksat’s supervisor.
As most of you surely know, Prieksat and Pierre game processor Caleb Gilkerson have had a couple of well-publicized disputes, including a criminal case against Gilkerson. They also have been in a dispute over processed geese that were abandoned at Gilkerson’s shop by hunters.
Initially, Gilkerson was allowed to donate the birds to charity after the season. But Prieksat ended that practice, saying it was not legal. Then Alicia King, a communications officer for the F&WS migratory bird division in Washington, D.C., indicated in a Pierre Capital Journal story that such gifting might be legal.
Oberholtzer said the sequence led to a review of policy and contacts with King, who “kind of gave an ambiguous answer that it may be legal. She really didn’t know. ”
Oberholtzer said the review has affirmed Prieksat’s position that Gilkerson cannot cannot give away processed migratory birds that have been abandoned at his shop.
“If a hunter wants his or her birds to go to a charity, it’s certainly the hunter’s responsibility to pick up those birds and donate them personally,” Oberholtzer said.
Gilkerson and other game processsor should work hard to contact hunters and get them to pick up their birds, Oberholtzer said. Gilkerson said he’s done that, often without success. According to the law, he can only discard the birds, unless they are taken by a state or federal agency, Oberholtzer said.
So what Emmett Keyser and the state Game, Fish & Parks Department is proposing would be legal, Oberholtzer said. The state could take the abandoned geese - more than 100 last year at Gilkerson’s - and distribute them to the needy through the Sportsmen Against Hunger program.
The feds could also take the birds, although they wouldn’t pass them on for human consumption, Oberholtzer said.
“We don’t know how the birds were handled, the conditions when they were shot. So simply because of safety concerns, we would not be comfortable transferring them for human consumption,” he said. “We could take them to zoos and bird-rehab centers, and other entitites that could use the meat.”
Next up, I guess, the GF&P Commission will consider a rule clarifying its authority to take possession of migratory birds abandoned at processors.
Clear? Pretty much, I think.



