By Kevin Woster
It’s possible I’ve been unfair in my criticism of Vice President Dick Cheney’s hunting style.
He might have learned something since 2003, when he took part - along with former Dallas Cowboys quarterback Roger Staubach - in a game-preserve shoot in Pennsylvania that downed more than 400 pen-raised pheasants.
Cheney himself was credited with 70 or so. But that was just the morning shoot. He snuffed an unknown number of pen-raised ducks during the afternoon blast.
I guess it’s no big deal. These birds were hatched and reared to get shot. They’re basically pen poultry produced as targets for the wealthy shotgunners. Hammering a few hundred doesn’t make a bit of different to the wildlife population around the hunt club.
Still, it seems hoggish. And tacky. And hardly hunting. In fact, it seems bad for the future of hunting. Real hunting, that is.
I’m not aware that the vice president has ever said he regrets that instance of scattergun excess, or that he has decided he really wants more out of a hunting experience than just pulling the trigger. But maybe I’ve missed some thoughtful explanation of personal growth on his part.
Most of us have had them. I overbagged a number of times in my younger years of hunting. For a time, I was a bird hog. I learned to regret those mistakes, and tried to become a better hunter. I hope I have.
My excesses were in many ways more offensive than what the vice president has done. First, they broke the law. Next, even though I never killed anything like 70 birds in a day, I was killing “real” game birds, not the sad imitations that exist at that Pennsylvania shooting club, and others like it around the country.
Paul Nelson’s place isn’t like most of those clubs. Like the best of South Dakota’s hunting preserves, it’s a high-quality establishment, with well established habitat,exceptional accomodations and top-notch pen-raised birds that do a reasonable imitation of the wild thing.
Nelson’s a good guy, from what little I know, who understands how to produce a quality preserve hunt. As I understand it, he manages a healthy population of wild pheasants on his place as well, although any sizable hunting preserve must rely mainly on pen-raised birds to handle the sheer number of kills required.
Nelson understands pheasants and pheasant hunting. That’s why his guests don’t have to. I’ll admit that I’m making an assumption when I say the vice president doesn’t know much at all about pheasant hunting, or think much about the fabled ringneck except as a target.
That seems to be his history.
But maybe I’m wrong. Maybe Cheney is more engaged with the mangement issues, the beauty of the Nelson place and the sport of the hunt than I’m giving him credit for.
Maybe he doesn’t just come to South Dakota to pull the trigger. Maybe he only kills a handful of birds a day - or even just one preserve limit of 15 - at Nelsons, and enjoys the visit for the more important qualities it provides. Maybe he really hunts.
 If that’s true, I’d be happy to retract my earlier comments and apologize.
All it’ll take is a phone call, or an e-mail - from Cheney, one of his staffers, Nelson, or one of his staffers.
 I’d love to know what goes on, from the inside.