By Jeremy Fugleberg
Gov. Rounds signed the state-wide smoking ban today. Now comes the doom and gloom (and even some joy) from business owners affected by the ban.
From what I’ve seen, there’s very little evidence to prove that business suffer dramatically in the years after a smoking ban is enacted.
Sure, there might be some short-term loss.
But it’s soon soon to tell (and hard to measure) whether banning smoking actually hurts businesses — even those where smokers tend to congregate.
There’s also little evidence that second-hand smoke hurts workers. There are plenty of PR statements, and lots of poorly-proved arguments.
I think South Dakota made a big change, and both sides have little evidence (beside hysteria) to back their points up. And yet, here we are. A law was signed, and many are both pleased and outraged.
For those of you who think the smoking ban is a good idea, where’s your evidence that second-hand smoke hurts workers? And yes, I expect scientific studies — not just talking points.
For those of you who fear a loss of business, where do you get your proof?