Sub-contractors lose more than $500,000 from Gordmans’ building work
Tuesday, September 30th, 2008I don’t know if you caught or not, but the article ran yesterday. To boil it down, the general contractor in charge of the Gordmans building interior work disappeared, and left the Rushmore Crossing developer and a bunch of contractors holding the bag to the tune of more than $500,000.
It’s not really Gordmans fault, and has nothing to do with that company’s recent acquisition by Sun Capital. the only thing Gordmans did was vouch for the company. If you look at the contractor’s Web site, it’s got a lot of Gordmans in it.
“I must say that you really do live up to your motto – a good name is more desirable than great riches.†– Gene Kaplan, Corporate Director Property Management & Construction Gordman’s
I finally got a call back from Gordmans, and the press person said the CEO didn’t want to comment because the matter was probably “sensitive.”
So now both contractors and the developer are lawyered up. Still no word on Dan Henry Construction of Kansas, the contractor.
Here’s a tidbit that didn’t make the article in the newspaper: sounds like the contractor’s foreman got stiffed of his pay, and even had to pony up his own cash to keep some people on the job. Said Jake Shad of Century Glass:
He said his paycheck bounced and he’s looking for a new job.
How’s that for a kick in the teeth?



